Superstar

The head-on confrontation between Hugo and Anthony directly detonated the enthusiasm of all the media and made the entire entertainment circle lively.

This time, "U.S. Weekly" reporter James Rattle robbed everyone of the limelight, and James did not expect that a friendly move towards Hugo at the premiere of "The Final Analysis" would actually exert its power a year later. , Won him the biggest breakthrough in his career.

After the Anthony press conference ended, the day went down, James conducted an exclusive interview with Hugo for an hour, and then he used "Sincerely apologize, neither humble nor overbearing..." as the headline, the first time for the assault that attracted countless lights. Reports. In the whole article, James expounded the whole incident in a plain tone, impartially, restored the situation at the scene as truthfully as possible, and then expressed his own views.

"Hugo was deeply aware of the mistakes in his behavior. He repeatedly expressed sincere apologies for beating Anthony and offered to compensate Anthony. As a public figure, Hugo knew that his behavior was incorrect.' "Sex", he is also trying his best to make up for the bad influence caused by this incident. We should condemn Hugo, but should not criticize him, at least we should see his sincerity and approve his change of attitude.

But on the other hand, is there more inside story behind Hugo's wrong behavior? This is obvious. Anthony repeatedly used bad language to slander Hugo, which not only slandered Hugo’s creative talents, but also maliciously accused Hugo’s creations of plagiarism. This is unfounded and meaningless. Allegations; and also carried out personal attacks on Hugo, maliciously distorted Hugo’s response to the Golden Globe Awards, deliberately created Hugo’s so-called big-name rumors, and deliberately misinterpreted Hugo’s'private' life. This is absolutely Behavior that should be condemned.

When journalists carry out malicious interpretations of public figures under the banner of the'right to know' and'freedom of the press', this is within the scope of the law, but this is to protect the transcendent status of the media, not to become the media to make news. Tool of.

Obviously, Anthony took advantage of the principle that the'media accuses public figures' not being bound by news facts, and carried out an unreasonable attack on Hugo. The purpose was not to verify the facts, but to'infuriate' Hugo and ultimately create news. The purpose of the explosion point. Anthony succeeded. His bruises are the best evidence. He won attention, sympathy, and news.

While we condemn Hugo's anger to Anthony, we should also see Anthony's leading role in this incident. This is a prank directed by Anthony.

After the incident ended, Hugo was condemned, punishable, confessed, and accepted the facts. Then, should Anthony also bear the corresponding responsibility? When Anthony used freedom of the press as a weapon to attack public figures, When seeking huge news profits, this incident itself is violent, and at the same time it should be absolutely prohibited!"

James's whole article looks impartial and righteous, analyzing the whole incident based on facts, but in fact, after reading the whole article, it is not difficult to see that he is standing in Hugo's perspective and screaming for Hugo. However, James is smart that he did not blindly say good things for Hugo. After playing 50 boards on both sides, he emphasized Hugo's correct attitude and condemned Anthony for his bad intentions. Under such circumstances, the people's psychological balance has also quietly changed.

In fact, this is also the purpose of Hugo's decision to directly face-to-face with Anthony. Now it seems that Hugo has already succeeded in half.

This issue of "U.S. Weekly" sold 300,000 copies across the United States in just one day. This result is comparable to the sales of other times in a week or even half a month. From this data, it can be seen that this A golden globe celebration feast brawl attracted attention.

Although Nicholas McLenna missed Hugo's interview, this does not prevent him from speaking for Hugo in the latest issue of the Los Angeles Times.

"Hugo Lancaster apologizes sincerely, and Anthony Stewart has no face to accept it." This long title is enough to attract a lot of attention.

In the article, Nicholas said, “Although Hugo knew he was caught in a trap, he did not shirk his responsibility. Instead, he bravely frankly frank his mistakes and actively showed a friendly attitude to make up for. At one point, Hugo is worthy of forgiveness. Everyone makes mistakes, but not everyone has the courage to admit it, especially when someone else deliberately guided you to make the mistake, it is more difficult to shirk responsibility than to take responsibility. Too much. Hugo’s attitude is worthy of commendation."

On the contrary, Nicholas believes that Anthony’s behavior is a bad example of the journalist industry, because he maliciously used his rights to truly regard reporters as the "uncrowned king" and arbitrarily'manipulate' news hot spots through slander, slander, and provocation. The way to achieve the purpose of plundering news is the degeneration of news. When chanting the slogan of "restore the truth", but for the sake of "sales, money, attention, reputation" to seek one's own'private', this is definitely an insult to freedom of the press.

Nicholas even stated righteously, "If Anthony doesn't face his mistakes, this will be a starting point for the decay of the press..."

Compared to James of "U.S. Weekly", Nicholas's attitude to Hugo is very obvious, he is completely from Hugo's standpoint to explain. But Nicholas is better at it. He raised the whole problem to the height of the news field, which is also the smartest point.

Because under Nicholas’s suggestion, Anthony’s impure motives turned Hugo’s counterattack into "legitimate defense." This also turned Hugo’s attack on Anthony into a means of self-protection, not only without accusations, but on the contrary. It should be affirmed. Nicholas even repeatedly emphasized that even though Hugo was "just defense" he still expressed his sincere apologies, and this humility is commendable.

It can be said that Nicholas is sing a hymn to Hugo by stealing the concept, and ordinary people are still paying for it.

The “Los Angeles Times” reported on the Golden Globe awards ceremony a day ago, and of course it also included the illicit assault at the celebration banquet. Nicholas lashed out at Hugo in this newspaper, and the newspaper sold a hundred thousand dollars. One day later, Nicholas revealed the truth and clarified the facts for Hugo, and this newspaper sold a full 2.5 million copies in one day. This set of data is since the Rodney King incident last year. "Los Angeles Times"'s highest sales!

After entering the 1990s, the average daily sales volume of the Los Angeles Times has remained at around 1.5 million copies, and development has stalled. When the Rodney King Incident broke out last year, the Los Angeles Times’ sales had been maintained for one week in a row. It is more than 2.8 million copies, but it has not been able to touch the threshold of three million. Who could have predicted that this time, what seemed to be a news hot spot in the entertainment industry, actually brought the "Los Angeles Times" sales to 2.5 million copies, which is really unexpected.

From this aspect, it can be seen that this incident has a high degree of attention.

While the "U.S. Weekly" and the "Los Angeles Times" spoke good things for Hugo, other media naturally took a different approach, hoping to get a piece of this news event.

Although there are only a handful of media who say they are willing to speak blatantly for Anthony Stewart, in addition to the "National Inquirer", there are several local'sex' newspapers that believe that Anthony is just a conscientious journalist, and Hugo is the embodiment of violence. , They are all grieving for Anthony. But in addition, the attitude of more media is that they do not clarify the facts for Anthony, but they do not intend to let Hugo go.

Most of the media maintain a neutral stance and believe that Anthony is indeed at fault, but Hugo should not fight each other. This unbiased view prevailed in the mainstream, and it was also a result of Hugo and Joseph's painstaking efforts. At least, this view did not accuse Hugo too much, and Hugo's sincere apology was also accepted by the public, which minimized the negative impact of this incident.

However, in addition to the neutral stance, the media's attention has shifted from the assault itself to other focuses. To a certain extent, no one cares about Anthony being assaulted, and the media's attitude is more like "rain." If the beating is wrong, but he has already apologized, so let’s focus on some other things..." This weird situation makes people dumbfounding~www.wuxiaspot.com~Although the neglect of the assault is not Anthony’s Yes, but the media reporters still complied with Anthony's wishes and focused their attention on Hugo's big-name incident, which was also the biggest hot spot in the assault.

Hugo’s experience is indeed a bit strange. The "Death Poetry Society" was an instant hit. Although it did not make Hugo really one of the first, he did become the protagonist. From this point of view, Hugo was originally Movies with big-name shelves and non-male protagonists are not accepted, so in the past few years, news about Hugo playing big-names has appeared in the newspapers several times, and the circles are more or less ridiculously discussed. .

And this time, after Hugo went through the trough, he contributed two more'exquisite' color masterpieces, and made it to the top in one breath. Even further, he was recognized by the Golden Globe nomination in terms of acting. Now Hugo's situation is better. After the "Death Poetry Society", there was a lot of progress in that period. Under such circumstances, another big-name rumors have emerged, and people have to think that Hugo’s old “illness” has relapsed. This also made the argument about Hugo playing big names not clarified at all. Instead, it appeared like ‘spring’ bamboo shoots after the rain.

This is what Anthony hopes-although not the way he hoped, but it is not what Hugo can predict.