Rebirth to 80s: Daughter-in-law is a Bit Spicy

"Mr. Mond, you are a well-known architect worthy of learning from newcomers. You have made very outstanding achievements in the field of architecture. It is a role model I yearn for. It is difficult for a student like me to have anything to do with a well-known architect like you. Intersection, if it weren’t for the fortune of being a classmate with your daughter for a year, this kind of intersection would be almost impossible. I’m standing a few meters away from you now. In fact, where I am, I have been struggling with you for many years. Compared with the status, it is the distance between China and the United States, and the difference between the Chinese architecture circle and the mainstream architecture circle in the world. I am nothing in the Chinese architecture circle. How can I compare with your Pritzker Architecture Prize Where is the winner?"

Xia Xiaolan looked directly at Mond Dawson.

There are two collections of works in front of Mond, and he hasn't read them yet.

But Eric sent those to the jury, and the jury members are already watching.

The jury's aesthetics of architectural works will not be higher than that of the group of people guarding outside the court. Everyone is not professional and can only be appreciated from the perspective of ordinary people.

Rushing—

This is the sound of turning the copperplate color printing paper.

"Of course I can’t compare to you, but I will work hard in this direction. I’m only 22 years old. It’s normal to be no better than you now. By the time I am 32 and 42 years old, I may be eligible to talk to you as an equal. …The premise is that I have the opportunity to not be excluded from the international architecture circle because of other people's slander!"

"The most ironic thing about this infringement case is not the defendant's discrediting me, but in the United States, a country that promotes equal rights, someone will use a fixed impression to convict me first!"

"The appearance is given by my parents. It just fits the aesthetics of some people. It doesn't mean that I shouldn't work hard."

"I am a Chinese. It doesn't mean that my IQ should be lower than others. How many Americans has the'American Dream' inspired? Everyone has the opportunity to create miracles. Why is the outstanding performance of a Chinese be questioned?"

"Using a private life to attack a woman is the most shameless and indecent method. What's the point of forcing a witness to admit that he likes me in court? Like it does not mean desire, nor does it mean that he should lose the most basic moral standards. Perjury for me!"

"I said these words at the door of the court in the morning. I hope that those who are at the door of the court and who are enthusiastic about this lawsuit can be good'judges'. Whose works are better and who can make'theatre renovations' more. I hope that the members of the jury can participate in judging the strength of the plan. Your approval may not determine the outcome of the lawsuit, but I believe you will have your own judgment! "

"As for Mr. Mond Dawson, judging from your professional perspective, who is more powerful than Lisa and I? If Lisa is not as good as me, why should I occupy a woman with low strength and not as good as mine? Architect's work?"

"It is said that it was Mr. Mond who expressed doubts to the AIA Supernova Architects Jury. You once talked with the defendant Ms. Lisa on the construction site of the theater. After a conversation, you can conclude that Lisa is the creator of the plan-you can Swear by your reputation, can you make a fair selection? Have you seen the defendant create this project with your own eyes?"

Buzzing.

The jury was talking loudly.

Finally, a jury spoke:

"I think Mond needs to answer her question."

"Mund should make a judgment in court."

"She is qualified to ask Mond to do this."

The jury members do not have a legal background. They are young and old, male and female, and they are all composed of ordinary people selected at random.

Some people say that the jury system of the common law system led to the prolonged resistance of litigation and violated the principle of efficiency of litigation in modern society. And because the jury has no legal background and does not understand the law Public opinion.

It is difficult to say what kind of news brainwashing these jury members have undergone before being selected.

The judge ruled that Xia Xiaolan won the lawsuit, and if the jury held an objection, the lawsuit would be a protracted battle.

The jury system has always been questioned, but it has been implemented, because these ordinary people selected at random have effectively prevented judges from abusing their trial power! Provisional formation, random selection, and subsequent isolation are the basic rules of the jury. This system can also effectively prevent judicial corruption... Merely bribing the judge is useless. If the judge decides a case too ridiculously, these jury members will be the last one. Line of defense!

Trial bias that sounds weird must be unfair, and the jury will be able to speak out!

Selling miserables to the jury can certainly get sympathy points, and respect like Xia Xiaolan's self-confidence can also win.

People who do bad things will have a guilty conscience, panic, and bluff and aggressive.

The jury has gone through the morning and afternoon trials, and they have their own judgment.

They asked Mond to answer questions!

Is the so-called professional barrier really that strong?

They want to see if the works selected from the eyes of ordinary people are completely opposite to those selected by the Pritzker Architecture Prize winner—Xia Xiaolan, a female student from China who insists on going to the United States to fight a lawsuit, has so many American witnesses. Willing to appear in court to testify for her, won't all of them be bought off?

The GMP partner testified.

Cornell's senior testified.

Cornell's professor testified.

The rich man testified.

In comparison, Lisa's testimony is a bit weak.

Mrs. Wilson didn't even have time to say too much, and was defeated by Harold's appearance in court.

There were also two open collections in front of the judge.

"Mr. Mond Dawson, please answer the plaintiff's question and make your own judgment as a professional."

The judge not only judges whose works are of higher level, but he also sent the original manuscripts provided by Xia Xiaolan and Lisa to Mond Dawson.

Because the two manuscripts are too close in time, it is even difficult for technical appraisal to distinguish which one is the first and which is the latter.

What about professionally?

Can Mond Dawson judge according to the idea of ​​the design drawing?

There is a difference between original and copying, which can only be judged by masters.

If Mond Dawson makes a judgment according to the law, the court can only consult other master architects. Of course he can refuse the appraisal, or appraisal indiscriminately, then he has to pray that Lisa can "create" a steady stream of good works in the future, and Xia Xiaolan has never recovered from then, and will never design any works...or it would be too slapped.

How would Mond choose?

Xia Xiaolan looked at him with a smile.

Silent these days, it is to the current general!

She was afraid that Mond would not be a witness for Lisa.

Fortunately, Mond came anyway.

Will Mund take the risk, rectify Lisa's name, and nail Xia Xiaolan to death, or will he take it as soon as he sees it, and brake in time?

Mond finally reached out and opened the two collections of works in front of him. The court was quiet, and no one disturbed him—he must be painful in his heart. He had seen Xia Xiaolan's collections a long time ago, but he wanted to pretend. It's the first time to see it!