Rebirth to 80s: Daughter-in-law is a Bit Spicy

The more I hear it, the more familiar it becomes.

It's like at Cornell University, she seized on the point of "racial discrimination" and severely repaired Mrs. Dawson's meal... Change the soup without changing the medicine, the entry point of the "female occupational discrimination" chosen by Lisa this time .

Americans like to listen to stories.

The media needs such stories, celebrities need stories, even scientists have to make their debut with stories. Only when Apple hit Newton did the "universal gravitation" theory be born. Only by selling ‘story’ can it be easily noticed in the United States. This is the same reason that the entertainment industry likes to create "personal design" for stars.

Xia Xiaolan also knows what urinary **** is in Americans. To be honest, she also thought about whether to take advantage of this.

Of course not to deal with Lisa, because Xia Xiaolan herself is confident in winning the lawsuit, she wants to deal with Mond.

If, as a weak person, face the media's accusation of Mund's "professional bullying", what will be the effect after the lawsuit is won? Xia Xiaolan only had this idea, but didn't do it, because it was too shameful to let her act as a weak person!

Win by winning the sympathy of others?

Mr. Xia didn't like the little white flowers swaying in the wind like this.

If she insists on saying that she is a flower, it is also an Overlord Flower. When she meets her opponent head-on, she swallows her opponent in one bite to relieve her anger!

But unexpectedly, Lisa did very skillfully what she hadn't done.

I don’t know if Mrs. Dawson provided inspiration for Lisa. What Lisa said on the talk show made Xia Xiaolan feel very disgusting. Of course, “female occupational discrimination” existed, not only in 1987, but even in 2017. The same The resume will give priority to male job applicants, and they will be paid differently for the same post. Xia Xiaolan herself is very disgusted with this.

What Lisa said is also true, it is very difficult for a female architect to get ahead!

If she stands up to accuse GMP's practices, expose the unspoken rules of the industry, and call for fairness for women in the same industry, Xia Xiaolan can regard the other party as a fighter. Although Lisa's protest is useless, the industry rules cannot be overturned by one person. For women to get opportunities at work, they must let those managers see how powerful women are.

But Lisa is not because of this.

After so many years in GMP, Lisa has never let go of a fart. Why didn't he dare to jump out and say this before?

Because Lisa may have thought it was unfair before, but she was incapable of resisting such unfairness.

Now, she hypnotizes herself, and really sees the theater renovation project as her own work...

After Xia Xiaolan watched the interview, Mrs. Wilson, who was on the show at the same time, did not firmly say that the ‘theatre renovation plan’ was Lisa’s work. She just told the audience about the various intersections between Lisa and Lisa during the renovation of the theater. He also said how much trouble he had caused Lisa. He was really not a kind customer.

This is more effective than just saying something.

When the host asked about Lisa becoming the defendant, Mrs. Wilson also changed the subject:

"I don't mention the lawsuit today. That is what the judge needs to decide. I believe in the justice of the law."

The host laughed in cooperation.

Slap--

Xia Xiaolan turned off the TV.

"Eric, this interview is interesting, not only for me, but the other party has also considered your field of expertise!"

Isn't it?

Eric is a very well-known affirmative lawyer, litigating the poor and the weak, which is Eric's label.

Lisa played this hand, mostly taught by her lawyer, preemptively, and snatched the lines that Eric might use to persuade the jury in court.

Eric wants to say how weak Xia Xiaolan, a Chinese student, is. The other party can broadcast the show and let the jury see how weak Lisa is... Although Eric believes that the evidence in hand now does not need to play sympathy cards. , But also disgusted by what Lisa did.

The "sympathy card" is the last thing that lawyers rely on. Some people have broken the law, but there are reasons for the matter. The lawyers will use the "sympathy card" to defend them from crime and commutation.

For example, in the United States in 1984, there was a shooting that shocked the whole country. A ten-year-old boy was continuously sexually assaulted by his coach. When the coach was arrested by the police, he looked indifferent and arrogant. The boy’s father was so angry that he waited at the airport in Louisiana. The coach who sexually assaulted his son was shot dead in front of the police.

The police reacted and threw his father down. His father did not resist, only the successful relief of revenge on his face.

The father was originally convicted of second-degree murder. The news spread quickly. The airport surveillance screen was released on TV. The Americans regarded the avenging father as a hero. Public opinion raged and petitioned and pressured the court. . There was also a doctor of psychology who took the initiative to diagnose the father. In the end, under pressure from all parties, the judge changed his father’s charge from second-degree murder to manslaughter-five-year probation + 300 hours of community service. Although the heroic father was shot and killed The rapist, in fact, has not been in jail for a day!

This is the story where law and humanity finally stand together.

It is also an example of public opinion interfering in legal judgments.

In the eyes of lawyers like Eric, that this case can be won is to play the "sympathy card". The TV station repeatedly broadcasts the footage of his father shooting and killing the coach after he did not resist the arrest, which is a kind of incitement.

He told Xia Xiaolan about this old case:

"So you see, this is the same method. That father committed a crime, but there are so many support for him not to be sentenced to murder, so he really was not sentenced. Lisa was fooling the public, she didn't mention the work itself. , I just say how much unfair treatment I have received in the GMP firm. The ratings of this talk show are good, and the audience is mainly female. They will sympathize with Lisa and will substitute themselves for Lisa's experience... After all, Sex discrimination in the workplace does not only happen to Lisa."

Xia Xiaolan tutted twice:

"Lisa cleverly shifted the attention of the public. She was clearly a defendant, but she seemed to have become a victim. Because of the discrimination and suppression in the workplace, she did not dare to resist the decision of the GMP firm, even if the firm wanted to take her work. She can only acquiesce to an award for a newcomer-I see Mr. Kissinger, I am afraid that he is under a lot of pressure now."

Kissinger has been portrayed as a villain who discriminates against female employees and bullies female subordinates.

As for why Kissinger helped Xia Xiaolan?

There must be an unseen relationship between money and power or sex!

The image of a woman in the workplace who swallowed her voice, suffered all the grievances, and then fought back angrily, is firmly portrayed in the hearts of the audience, and will also affect the judgment of the jury and the judge, and even reverse some evidence that is unfavorable to Lisa——

As for Xia Xiaolan?

There is no doubt that she is a gainer.

The shameless villain, because he has lost his original benefits, is still very arrogant and in turn takes the victim to court. This is such a bad image.

In this case, everything she said could be misinterpreted, and Eric refused to accept any interview.