Police Detective

　　 In Bai Song's opinion, there are too many loopholes and clues in this case.

　　 When you want to hide a clue, you often leave more clues.

　　 The first is, since this contact person and the driver did not communicate via telephone or other means, then what was it through? According to common sense, if you want to crash into Bai Song's car, you must get the information as soon as possible, and then prepare to catch up, otherwise the intelligence will be behind for a few minutes, and you will not be able to catch it.

　　 The second is, how did the contact person know about the driver eating at the restaurant? Why rush to destroy the video today? Why didn't you know yesterday and the day before yesterday?

　　 What the **** is the person who went to secretly destroy the surveillance equipment today?

　　 The third is that the car is professionally modified. Who did it? It is impossible for people without a level of auto repair skills to do this. Moreover, this kind of modification, the general auto repair shop, would not dare to give money.

　　 This is not to change anything else, but to change the brake failure. This is simply a joke. Therefore, this car must have been modified at the parking place, and it is impossible to drive over after the modification. The driver's previous parking spot has also been found, but a lot of evidence was left at the scene.

　　The fourth is, who changed the seat belt of the car? These are two different things. The driver doesn't want to die, he is not stupid if the seat belt is broken or broken when he looks at it.

　　 Bai Song would not underestimate anyone, even the dead driver, he must not be a fool. Therefore, he has no doubt that the moment the seat belt of the car is fastened, there is no superficial problem.

　　 It wasn't until after a violent collision that the car seat belt had a problem. This is also a technical job. And it's probably not a group of people who changed the brakes before, because this modification is to avoid the driver.

　　Fifth...

　　 What era are you still dare to play like this...

　　 Is this treating the police as a fool? Perhaps in the eyes of non-professionals, this is the so-called perfect crime, but there are a lot of loopholes, and every time someone tries to erase a new loophole, either new evidence loopholes or new logic are left. Loopholes.

　　 Analyze one by one. In terms of contact methods, there may be several, and the most possible way is to contact directly. In other words, the location of the contact is the location that the driver can see, and the two communicate directly with each other through gestures.

Combined with the parking spot of the car, Bai Song and everyone analyzed the building structure of the community. If the contact person wants to be able to see Baisong's parking spot and the driver's parking spot at the same time, then there are not many places to choose from. The Li team arranged directly Two people went to the scene.

　　 About someone sabotaging the surveillance today, the information of this person is now on the table of several people.

　　 "This person has a problem, I don't look like a normal person." Someone put forward a point: "We have to give him a psychiatric appraisal."

　　 "Well, that must be done." Team Lee agreed.

　　 "Yeah, yeah, it has to be done." Someone echoed: "I will report to the Qin Detachment."

　　 "No need." Team Li raised his hand to stop him, "No hurry, there will definitely be arrangements for Qin Detachment."

This man is called Wang Shujun, a farmer and a native of Gan Province. He is in his 40s. He has been in Tianhua City for a while. He doesn’t cooperate with the police if he works part-time. The police don’t know anything and ask him why he wants to disrupt surveillance. What he said was that he wanted to steal something, and then there was nothing to steal. He was afraid of being discovered, so he broke the surveillance.

　　 It seems to everyone that this person will not be a liaison, but it is more likely that someone will hire him to do this. It is estimated that he has also made some promises.

　　 This person is stupid, a tendon, it is estimated that he took the money and was used by others.

　　 Sometimes, people like this are hard to be valued everywhere, but once someone shows good intentions to him, it is easy to be moved. Regarding his analysis, it is generally believed that the person who hired him gave a lot of money, which was enough to make him willing to take the risk of being caught.

　　 If it is only intentional damage to property, this matter will be an ordinary criminal case, and it is not even the standard of a criminal case. Therefore, even if this person is arrested by the police, it is estimated that he will be ordered and detained for at most 7 to 15 days.

　　 If it is a public security case, public security detention is a penalty, and the maximum time for a single case is 15 days; in a criminal case, the maximum time is 7 days. After seven days, either arrest or release is required.

　　 Arrest is impossible, this case is too small.

　　According to Article 122 of the Criminal Procedure Law: The period during which a criminal suspect is psychiatrically identified shall not be included in the time limit for handling the case.

　　 In other words, if the seven days of criminal detention are regarded as an hourglass with a countdown of seven days, then once the psychiatric appraisal starts, the hourglass will stop and restart until the moment the appraisal result comes out.

　　 Everyone analyzed it. Once the detainee has been detained for more than fifteen days, he will definitely have a great distrust of his "employer". This matter is much simpler.

　　 From the game with the opponent, it can be seen that the opponent handles many details very well and knows how to destroy evidence. but,

　　 Everyone who walks through ~www.novelmtl.com~ will leave traces---- Edmund Rocca.

　　 There was once a hot topic. If a professional criminal investigation expert commits a crime, is it possible to complete a perfect crime?

　　 This question actually has an answer, it's impossible.

　　 This is like asking, is it possible for top doctors and academicians to understand all medical skills?

　　The same goes for criminal investigators. The farther you go in an industry, the more specialized you will become. Maybe a footprint expert can handle his own footprints seamlessly, but he is impossible and capable of handling other clues.

　　...

　　 Next is the problem of repairing the car. In the process of repair and modification of such a large car, as well as the parking spot, many traces were still found. In terms of technique, this person's technique is true, but there are many bumps.

　　 In other words, this time the damage to the brake system of the car is likely to be at night and poor light conditions.

　　 What is the nature of destroying these things?

　　 These car repairers, but anyone who knows a little bit of the law can't engage in this behavior.

　　 Let me talk about the act of breaking the brake. If the repairman knows that the driver is going to kill, then he is an accomplice in the crime of intentional homicide; of course, he does not know it with a high probability, then in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 119 of the Criminal Law, he has committed the crime of sabotaging vehicles and has already caused it. Serious consequences, in this case, the sentence is exactly the same as the crime of intentional homicide.

　　 Let's talk about the act of breaching the seat belt, this is properly an accomplice of the crime of intentional homicide.

　　 Bai Song couldn't help being helpless for these people. How much money is appropriate for such a serious crime?